Marjorie Price exhibition at the Delaplaine Visual Arts Education Center, April 3rd – 25th

Sea Dance (diptych) 48″ x 108″

Marjorie Price’s exhibition of new paintings from The Bathers Series opens April 3 at the Delaplaine Visual Arts Education Center in Frederick, Maryland, a lovely, historical town outside of Washington D. C..

Having been an avid swimmer and competitive synchronized swimmer — as well as a painter — all her life, Marjorie’s connection to The Bathers Series is an especially personal one. The theme is inspired by her love of the water; the paintings express how the body moves and feels in another element, how once released from the pull of gravity, one feels a sense of freedom and abandon. The sea is never the same; the paintings in the series explore its endlessly changing moods. For a preview of the show, please visit her website.

“Of all the many themes I’ve painted throughout my life, The Bathers Series is perhaps the closest to my heart. I grew up along the shores of Lake Michigan, and water has always been my element,” says Price. “I’m told I swam as a tot even before I could walk. I’m so pleased to have the opportunity of showing the most recent Bathers at the Delaplaine Visual Arts Education Center.”

On April 3, at 2:00 PM, just prior to the opening of her show and in connection with the Frederick Reads event, Marjorie will present her recent memoir, A Gift From Brittany (Gotham Books, 2008, Paperback edition, 2009). The book tells about the years she lived in France in the 1960′s and her extraordinary experience of becoming a part of an ancient village in Brittany. There she met an elderly, illiterate peasant woman who lived across the road, and while outwardly the two women had nothing in common, they became close friends and transformed each others’ lives. Marjorie will answer questions and discuss the challenges and advantages of combining the dual careers of writing and painting.

Derivative of the Moving Image by Jennifer Bartlett

University of New Mexico Press, 2007
Reviewed by Metta Sáma

I’ve always enjoyed a book of poems that takes me on a journey: be it a full narrative, a lyrical fragmentation, a jaunt into surrealism, or, say, a basic concept: here is a soundscape beginning with A. I’ve mostly enjoyed how these books transgress their own rules, how they break apart the narrative moment to explore a lyric’s unsettling powers to transcribe a narrative on the outer edges of a cup, how they refuse to be stalled in a pattern. A poetic impulse, perhaps, to reconfigure, to remake; to piece together the puzzle while being wholly aware that on those puzzle lines, between those miniscule breaths that the pieces create, there are stories, moods, moments of un/reconciliation. The stories are always on the lines.

Jennifer Bartlett’s Derivative of the Moving Image (DotMI) is one such book. Divided into five titled sections (“When I Got My First Tattoo I Was.”, “Derivative of the Moving Image”, “Essays on Birds and Light”, “The Music Of”, and “Hypnagogic Diary”), each devoted to its own form/al construction: prose/like poems to lined poems that make use of the page-whole. Bartlett’s poems often teeter, often spin, often skip, often drown in the process of grieving.

A friend once said that prose poems should be neat little blocks; the poet who doesn’t make the block is lazy & not doing justice to the poem. I thought the friend was a little rigid and too invested in rules. When I read the first section of DotMI, however, I paused to reconsider that rule. The poems in “When I Got My First Tattoo I Was.” are quite heart collapsing, honest, and vulnerable. Many of them deal with the death of a sister, or death and dying in general. There is loss: of the body (“Her one collapsing lung thrown/onto the emergency room floor” (“When I Got My First Tattoo I Was.” 18, 19)), of what is real, of what one wants (“Why do you desert me? You know/my limbs are fragile (“Ghost Boy” 4, 5)), of what one can(not) hold (“That is why the moment my sister left her body our parents/made us turn from her” (“Elegy for the Trees” 16)), and of course, there is the perpetual impending loss (“This is/where we begin to give up, the both of us” (Coup de Grace 23, 24)). I can only admire the bravado of writing through such quakes, of that intense desire to excise from the psyche those hauntings.

And yet, I wonder I wonder I wonder. At what moment am I reading (Lord help me) poetry. Yes, I’m ready for the attacks. Bartlett’s first section read like the beginnings of essays, the beginnings of poems, the promise of that distilled insight. But these are the beginnings. I hesitated in writing about this book, because I, too, have lost and suffered and wanted nothing but the thing itself out of me. And poems helped me to deliver those things. Poems were the matter that could hold the fragments, the fractures, the dissonance. But, is the book of poems the place to house these beginnings?

Grief is difficult to write about, yes. There are clichés that sit with us (“Angels lie with me against these/worn sheets, assuring my journey” (“Coup de Grace” 2, 3), “my limbs are fragile; like paper dolls” (“Ghost Boy” 5), “Your house smelling like tattoo ink, if it can have a/smell” (“When I Got My First Tattoo I Was.” 5, 6)), and so on. There are tropes that hold the fort (moths that appear (perhaps only) to the person who has lost a love; moths that transform from annoying little pests to creatures “more beautiful than butterflies” (“From a Paris Hotel Room”)). There is the overstatement (“Tulip Farm” and “Elegy for the Tree”) that can create and destroy an entire poem.

So, I sat with this book trying to decipher where the poetic impulses were, where the tight sprawls of insight were, where the (dare I say it) craft was. I wonder: if these prose bits (in sections 1 and 3-5) were “tighter” in outward appearance, would Bartlett have sacrificed some of the easy pronouncements, some of the excessive overmakings (the dependence on the prosaic syntax, for example) to get to the bone? (In other words, could this book have survived without that first section? The other sections pick up speed (although there are still those moments of syntactical proseyness that stalls the emotions), and while filled with trepidations (“I plan on your leaving”), there is a bravado that transgresses the small worlds (“I am getting good/in this practicing”). Yes, there is a sweet wickedness in the I who is “[c]omplete in [her] autobiography of dirty feather” (“Whose Music Excels the Music of Birds” 20).

I love a first book of poems. I’m curious about structure, about voice and tone, about playing it safe, about jumping hard on the burning hot crushed glass, about temperament and musicality; I’m curious about all of those little poetry no-no rules broken or embraced or both. I’m curious about that workshop hand and heart, which is often vibrantly apparent in many first books. Mostly, I want to know that the poet has somewhere to g(r)o(w). Bartlett’s Derivative of the Moving Image is filled to the brim with a willingness to risk it all, and for that alone, I look forward to (a) lullaby without any music.

ShareThis

Clifford Henderson

Lily in the Snow by Yan-Li

Women’s Press, January 2010

Review by Georgia Ann Banks-Martin

A Different type of Woman

Before immigrating from Beijing to Canada, Yan Li worked as an instructor, translator and journalist. In her latest novel, ‘Lily in the Snow’, it is obvious that these early life experiences have inspired her writing. The novel focuses on the life of a young mother named Lily, who has left her native China to live in Canada. Upon her arrival, Canada unfolds like a roll of duck canvas before her and her son, who is referred to only as “Baby”. The culture feels formless to her; there is no oppressive government forcing cultural or social policy upon its people. Instead, what greets Lily is a university where she can enroll without anyone asking invasive questions, a community of Chinese people who for various reasons have also taken-up residence in Canada, and an unrelenting Christian Church that is trying to convert as many new immigrants as possible.

Li’s depiction of Lily, as she struggles to reinvent herself in this world, is almost hyper-real. Lily is a young woman and an experienced journalist, but she finds that her advanced education is worth little in her new country. Her job options include working as a maid in a private home, a maid in a hotel, a factory worker, or a secretary in a failing lawyer’s office. In addition, Lily’s critical and overbearing mother soon follows her, in part to see if Lily’s life is really better and, in part, to find herself. Together, the two of them embark on a life together.

Along the way, we meet other women who underscore the life that Lily does not want for herself – Mrs. Rice, who spends her days teaching the word of God and visiting those whom she might be able to convert; Camellia, who is often beaten by her husband, but who will not divorce him due to pressure from the church; and a woman Lily calls “Madam Jewelry”, who speaks in tongues and finds that this conflicts with church teachings.

In the end, all of these women, even Lily’s mother, are characters who are unable to write their own scripts. Lily doesn’t want to become like any of them. Yan Li’s depiction of Lily’s life is so well done that readers immediately feel like they know Lily and the other women of her community. Through them, the stories of women we all know, regardless of ethnicity, are given voice. ‘Lily in the Snow’ is a lyrical, funny and real snapshot of the strength and commitment that is required to become a fully self-aware and individualized woman.

Yan Li is the director of the Confucius Institute at the University of Waterloo and the coordinator of the Chinese Language Program at Renison University College, both of which are located in Ontario, Canada. Li’s other published works include her first novel written in English, ‘Daughters of the Red Land’ and her other novels – ‘Married to the West Wind’, ‘Red Duckweed’, and ‘The Lambs of Mapleton’ – all of which are written in Chinese.

Ann Rochon Ford talks with HCE about “The Push to Prescribe: Women and Canadian Drug Policy”

by Shana Thornton-Morris

Contributing Editor

Anne Rochon Ford discusses the collection of essays in the book The Push to Prescribe: Women & Canadian Drug Policy, which is a timely and complete look at a major North American health care crossroads. Editors Anne Rochon Ford and Diane Saibil worked with the Steering Committee of Women and Health Protection in order to present investigative writings with a straightforward message about pharmaceuticals and public health care policy. The Push to Prescribe details the impact of pharmaceuticals on our bodies, social interactions, environments and economics.

While Ford et al focus on the Canadian health care system, they also present a comparison to the U.S. system of approval for drugs from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), policies of the U.S. National Institutes of Health and sometimes standards in Europe—this is not a text that should be overlooked by American women and the international community in general.

“One of the main objectives is to point out the way in which pharmaceuticals specifically have an impact on women differential from that of men,” Ford said. “So that was one issue laced throughout the book. Another is that the commercialization of this aspect of medicine and the very dominant role that the pharmaceutical industry has in influencing not just promotion but regulation is deeply disturbing. We wanted to… outline how this is happening, …point out why this is problematic and …why it’s particularly problematic for women.”

The authors of The Push to Prescribe point out that neomedicalization has led to the consumption of drugs for questionable conditions like restless leg syndrome, overactive bladder and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). They also discuss that many women underestimate the impact of drugs like birth control pills, vaccines for the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), and statins with their limited benefits and increased impact on the environment. The effects of these drugs and medical treatments as well as Vioxx and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) class of anti-depressants, to name a few, are also analyzed in the book. The authors also discuss the limitations of past and present clinical trials prior to drug approval as well as the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). They give the reader an especially close analysis of how these drugs and the policies surrounding the drugs affect women.

“There are a lot of parallels with what’s going on in the States,” Ford said. “In fact, our regulatory programs are not that different. The Canadian system learns from and borrows from ways in which things have been done by the FDA. We consume the same drugs. We see your drug ads. There’s kind of a seamless border when it comes to these issues between Canada and the United States. Obviously, we’re at slightly different places regarding some of these issues. (…) While there are some distinctions between our two countries, I think there are way more similarities. There are many parallels in women’s health generally between the US and Canada.”

One of the distinctions mentioned by Ford is direct-to-consumer advertising. In Canada, direct-to-consumer advertising from drug companies is not exactly legal, though the authors of The Push to Prescribe show the leaks in the system. They discuss the standards of regulation concerning direct-to-consumer advertising in the US and Canada, and show a greater tolerance of US policies in Canada.

“In many cases,” Ford said, “it’s been shown that far too often what it (direct-to-consumer advertising) results in is people thinking that they need a drug when other more helpful solutions might have been the best bet to start with, but because people have been seduced by the messages in direct-to-consumer advertising they can often be quite insistent when they walk into a doctor’s office. Doctors have stated over and over in research… that they often feel like they’re pressured to prescribe now that people know more about drugs and think that they want them or need them. The other thing that’s important to realize is that the drugs that get advertised for the most part are not the drugs for life-threatening situations. They (the drugs in advertisements) are mostly drugs for things for which there are other, more helpful solutions. The other thing that’s happening slowly over time in the clinical setting between doctor and patient is that the patient comes in with this new knowledge because they have learned it from the advertising or they’ve gone onto the internet and the doctor doesn’t have a head start on suggesting changes in a person’s diet and lifestyle.”

At a time when American women are awaiting the votes of Congress to decide how health care will shift, the authors provide research and documents in order to examine pharmaceuticals and Canadian public health policy as they directly affect women and their families. In both Canada and the United States, women specifically are more affected by health care policies. The authors point out that women go to the doctor more frequently than men, women use more medications than men possibly due to living longer lives, and women make more medical decisions about other family members, especially children and seniors.

“One of the messages that needs a lot of attention is the extent to which we need to be educating children about drugs (pharmaceuticals),” Ford said. “Children learn in their homes and in their schools and sometimes they’re mimicking the behavior of their parents who automatically reach for an aspirin if they have a headache or just think that if they’ve been irritated that maybe they need an anti-depressant or sleeping pill or whatever. What’s happening with children is really where we need to be putting a lot more attention, not just in terms of reigning in the appalling degree of over-prescription to children which is finally starting to get some attention. I’m talking about going right down to toddlers being given anti-psychotics. There’s also a huge… need to be educating, to be infusing into our educational system the importance of healthy alternatives to drugs, to convey a very strong message that prescription drugs are not benign. They’re not candy. They’re not vitamins. They are controlled by a gatekeeper who is the physician for a reason. To think that we can continue to take them at the rate that we’re consuming them in our society is only going to lead to more problems. Kids need to hear the real story behind some of the movie stars who’ve overdosed lately and what’s going on there, just how many prescription drugs were those folks taking, whatever it takes to get the message through to kids that these are not benign substances and there are other ways of dealing with our health problems.”

Ford counsels women and parental guardians to step back and look at who is funding campaigns within schools to suggest diagnosis of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and other behavioral issues. She says that the information may look like it’s coming from the Boards of Education, but she says that almost always there is involvement from industry or from physicians and/or retired psychiatrists who have been hired by industry to come in and work with boards to try and complete testing on children. Ford says while some children need drugs, so many others just need to have their energy channeled in another way whether that’s through creative endeavors, sports, diet changes, talk therapy or other healthy, lifestyle changes. Ford suggests that many parents should try other alternatives first, instead of initially relying on prescriptions drugs.

Another concern mentioned by Ford is how many substances might combine to produce a long-term effect. She uses the example of a child taking anti-depressants for decades as well as the toxins present in the environment and the radiation emissions from cell phones and other gadgets. Most studies examine isolated effects of one drug on a person or radiation emissions, not both as well as other environmental substances. Ford calls for more caution in regard to administering drugs due to the uncertainty of the combined interactions of substances; moreover, she suggests the need for more studies on the combined effects of drugs and technology over the long-term.

“In terms of personal choice, look beyond the information that is produced by industry, i.e. information that will be somewhat biased because their main aim is to sell their product,” Ford said. “Look beyond those places for guidance when you’re making a decision about not just whether to take a drug but whether you need treatment for something in the first place. One of the issues that we bring out in two places in the book is the extent to which normal behavior, the everyday sadnesses of life, all kinds of things have become medicalized. I think we owe that to the pharmaceutical industry, so I think we have to be wary of information that is produced by them. Some of it is good… but we have to remember what their bottom line is, which is they want to sell their product and they need to satisfy their shareholders.”

Many women may struggle with knowing how to make this information more accessible to other women and even themselves. With hectic lives, women often lack the time to read such extensive and in depth information; yet it is crucial to women who are in control of their health care and the health care of their families. No doubt women are interested in health care practices and legislation that will affect their future decisions. However, women are more bombarded by advertisements that are sponsored in part or completely by pharmaceutical companies. Whether women see pharmaceutical advertisements on television, a magazine, the back of a bathroom door, announced over the radio or some other medium, they are acquiring information from drug companies. The authors evaluate advertisements and show that drugs like Viagra which are specific to men’s health are often marketed toward women. The authors also point out that even health-related and disease-related non-profit organizations are often sponsored and funded by drug companies.

“On the issue of how the average woman can make a difference, joining up with organizations who are trying to fight this in our respective countries—lending support, solidarity and letters—all of that helps,” Ford said. “We need to reach the people who are in decision-making places to say, ‘there are some real concerns here and there are a lot of us out here who have been harmed by drugs because our regulatory systems are not stringent enough.’ There are others out here who have been needlessly put on medication that is not doing them any good and in fact possibly doing them harm. We’re taking money away from more health-enhancing treatment options in order to put more money into treatment options that may not always be the best solution. That isn’t to say that drugs aren’t sometimes the best solution. Sometimes they are, but… our thinking about this has gotten skewed away from options that are more health promoting.”

Some women want to know how to obtain information produced by health and disease-related non-profit organizations that aren’t funded by corporate entities and pharmaceutical companies, but women often have trouble in locating grassroots organizations. According to the book, some non-profit organizations have developed guidelines for working with a corporate sponsor. Ford offered advice to women who want to support an organization that is not controlled by a pharmaceutical company’s agenda. “You can start by asking, ‘how are you funded?’” Ford said. “And if they are in any way cagey about their response, I would be concerned. Also, the internet allows us so much ability to find out that kind of information. For most websites, if you dig around long enough, you’ll find out who’s sponsoring them. They have an annual report. They have to say in there who funds them.”

Throughout the book, transparency is a concept taken up by the authors of The Push to Prescribe. They have not only called for greater transparency within the Canadian health care system in regard to drug policy, but they have also asked for heightened transparency concerning the overall environmental impact of drugs. The findings in the book question the medical ethics of current and past pharmaceutical practices, especially when the public has been mislead regarding the safety and efficacy of drugs.

“There’s certainly a lot more heat on about this issue around what the environmental impact is of pharmaceuticals in water, soil and so on. There’s a big issue that is getting worse because drug consumption is increasing in that drugs get into our water system first and foremost through how we secrete them through urine. People pour drugs down the toilet. Drugs get into landfills through garbage and leach out into the soil. So there are a number of ways in which pharmaceuticals are getting out there and getting back into us.” Ford calls that only problem number one. Ford says that problem number two concerns the available treatment systems for environmental damage.

“For example,” Ford said, “if they detect that there are high amounts of SSRI anti-depressants and anti-cholesterol drugs in a given water system and they use their standard treatments of treating bacteria in the water, the impact is not what we would like to see. In fact, what’s being created are these bi-products from where those two chemicals meet, so where the drug meets the chlorine or whatever the treatment is. The outcome of that is also problematic. The bi-products are called disinfectant bi-products, so the bi-products are themselves creating health problems. We’ve got a huge mess here and it’s only beginning to see the light of day. What Sharon (Batt) argues at the end of her chapter (9) and how we conclude that section of the book is that if we don’t start looking upstream, (…) our attention is going to be misguided. (…) We would argue that the treatment solutions have to include decreasing drug consumption.”

In Chapter four, “Who Pays the Piper?”, Sharon Batt writes that the purpose of her analysis “is not to demonize the actors but to bring to light underlying conditions that could be modified through improved understanding and policies.” While the authors would like to be heard by their health care system in Canada, they have suggestions for all women who make health care decisions. Batt writes again in chapter four, “No health care system, whether publicly or privately insured, can give every sick person everything he or she wants. A public health care system implies sharing resources, spreading available funds across many services and prioritizing on the basis of need and evidence.” Ford and the other authors of The Push to Prescribe ask for greater transparency, actions as well as discussions, decreased drug consumption and an overall evaluation and modification of pharmaceuticals and their place in health care.

According to Ford, Women and Health Protection has worked with a number of grassroots organizations in the United States. Women and Health Protection has existed for about ten years. Their sister organization The Canadian Women’s Health Network also has worked on a number of joint campaigns with American groups. Some US groups the Canadian organizations have worked with are the National Women’s Health Network and the Boston Health Collective. Ford said that Women and Health Protection has also done some work around drugs used in and associated with breast cancer with the group Breast Cancer Action in San Francisco.

The Push to Prescribe: Women and Canadian Drug Policy
ed. Anne Rochon Ford and Diane Saibil
Women’s Press, 2010

Not Quite Paradise: An American Sojourn in Sri Lanka by Adele Barker

Beacon Press, January 2010
Review by Suzanne Kamata

It takes a certain kind of woman to up and move from Arizona to a war-torn, wet country on the other side of the world. Such a woman is Adele Barker, who, in 2001, shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States, brings – drags? – her fifteen-year-old son Noah to Sri Lanka where she will spend the next year teaching Russian literature.

Barker and her son settle in a house at the edge of the jungle where they quickly realize that they are not alone. Along with many ants, the house is inhabited by rats and geckos, and frequently visited by monkeys, one of which steals the television antenna. Although Barker has been planning on doing the housekeeping herself, and resists anything that smacks of colonialism, she soon finds herself with a maid, a tuk-tuk driver, and a gardener. After all, these people are depending upon her for employment. Over the course of her stay, these people also become her friends.

The author never explains what initially attracted her to Sri Lanka. She spends a lot of time trying to sort out the conflict between the Muslim Tamil Tigers, revolutionaries who have pretty much taken over the north of the island, and the Buddhist Sinhalese. (Barker lives in primarily Buddhist Kandy, where there is a shrine housing the Buddha’s tooth.) She is also curiously remote about her personal life. Although she mentions the break-up of a friend’s marriage, she never writes about her own romantic entanglements. (Don’t expect Eat, Pray, Love in Sri Lanka here.) Also, as an expat mother myself, I was interested in her relationship with her son. How did she convince him to go to Sri Lanka? What was his school life like once he got there? Was he adopted? (She mentions that he is from Paraguay.) Does he have a father? Although she alludes to some problems that Noah is having at school, and to his boredom in a place with no TV or decent soccer pitch, she doesn’t go into great detail. Perhaps this is out of consideration for her son’s privacy, or an innate reserve, but I wanted to know more.

When Barker leaves at the end of the year, she vows to return one day to hear the northerners’ point of view on the civil war, but then something bigger happens – here, where most people had never heard the word “tsunami” before, a 30-foot wave crashes over the coast of Sri Lanka washing away tens of thousands of people. Barker returns to the country, this time without her son, who is now a college student, to check up on friends and survey the damage wrought on “the day when the sea came to the land.” She finds heartbreak and loss at every turn, but also resilience.

At one point, she admires a woman’s gold necklace:

“It was all we had left,” a young woman who looked to be pregnant said. “When the sea came to the land, many of us had our saris on. Do you know how to wrap a sari?” she asked me with laughing eyes.
“Don’t test me on it,” I replied, “but kind of. With help. With pins.”
They all laughed.
The one who was all smiles continued. “We lost our saris in the wave. The sea unwrapped them from us. When we came out of the sea, we were nearly naked. Some of us had slips on. Some of us had nothing. But we had our jewelry.”

Although Barker herself remains something of an enigma, her affection for the people and the country is never in doubt. And as one disaster supplants another in the public imagination, she presents a clear portrait of an island nation persevering in the face of challenges.

Suzanne Kamata

Author of Losing Kei (Leapfrog Press, 2008)
Editor of Love You to Pieces: Creative Writers on Raising a Child with Special Needs (Beacon Press, May 2008) and Call Me Okaasan: Adventures in Multicultural Mothering (Wyatt-Mackenzie Publishing, 2009)

In a Pale Blue Light by Lily Poritz Miller

Women’s Press, October 2009
Review by Mary Senior Harwood

Many books have been written about the Holocaust, but few, if any provide the added perspective of the extreme racial predjudice of South Africa in the same era.

Miller’s book reads much like memoir, with the slow pace that often accompanies that genre. We are pulled in through Libka, a teenager who has just lost her father. Her parents moved to South Africa in 1930, part of the last wave of Jewish immigrants out of Lithuania before Hitler’s occupation, and her mother has never fully assimilated to her new home. The family is distant – socially and geographically – from other Jewish families. Libka grieves by further withdrawing from her peers, which ultimately leads to expulsion from school and to a “school for difficult girls.”

Through Miller’s story, we experience a time period when Boers ruled roughly, with little difference between them and the Nazis the family left behind. Libka’s attachment to one of their black servants leads to trouble, as does her friendship with a Malay boy she meets on the beach. In each case, Libka looks beyond the racial barriers and sees the person within, whereas few other characters in the book see Libka for herself, not even her own family. Her brother Beryl is too wrapped up in himself and his social life outside the Jewish community. Her mother is withdrawn in her grief and sees little of her family other than the most immediate and basic needs of her growing family.

Sara, her mother, is advised by a rather well-drawn Mrs. Peker, a nosy, blousy woman who has decided to run Sara’s life. Mrs. Peker tells her to hire a man she knew in her shtetl (Yiddish for home town) to run the family factory. In her grief, Sara does not see beyond the man’s obsequious manner. At one point, he almost rapes Libka and is found to be a thief.

Throughout the story, Libka, through rebellious, is internal. She is not an active catalyst for change, like her friend Anya. The result is the one flaw I find in the book. The pacing is slow and the mood so internal that, especially in the beginning, it is difficult to get into the story. Very little happens for the first 50 pages, and at times throughout the book the writing bogs down, sounding almost like a translation to English. The author makes a liberal use of Yiddish and South African expressions throughout, and includes a glossary. While she does this to add authenticity, at times the phrases become barriers. No one likes to have to flip back and forth to a glossary to read a novel. This is one of those times when I could see how a little could go a long way.

In spite of the book’s shortcomings, it is a story that takes us to a world seldom shown in North American literature.

Leslie McMurtry

Lily Poritz Miller

About the Author

Lily Poritz Miller was born in Cape Town, South Africa, and came to the United States with her family when she was fifteen. She began her editorial career in book publishing in New York at The Macmillan Company and later McGraw-Hill, then moved to Toronto, where she was senior editor and McClelland and Stewart for eighteen years.

She has written three plays, which were performed in New York and Toronto, and received a Samuel French national award for her play The Proud One. Her short stories were published in the anthology American Scene: New Voices. She has also written for film. She presently divides her time between Toronto and New York. Visit her online at www.lilyporitzmiller.com.

In a Pale Blue Light

A story of loss, defiance and change emerges from the magnificent setting of Cape Town in the late 1930s through the outbreak of World War II. Young Libka Hoffman is struggling with the loss of her father and the social conventions that frown upon her relationships with her most trusted friends. Libka’s exploration of socially forbidden territory eventually brings her to expulsion from her school and ostracism by her peers. Powerfully told in a unique voice, “In a Pale Blue Light” achieves an authentic and rarely achieved insight into Jewish life in South Africa during the tumultuous times around World War II.

Here is the Music Player. You need to installl flash player to show this cool thing!